<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: B2B Blogging – Direct or Indirect Marketing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.birddog.co.uk/2009/01/b2b-blogging-direct-or-indirect-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.birddog.co.uk/2009/01/b2b-blogging-direct-or-indirect-marketing/</link>
	<description>We add value to businesses with the creative delivery of Brand Strategy through Digital Channels.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://www.birddog.co.uk/2009/01/b2b-blogging-direct-or-indirect-marketing/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birddog.co.uk/?p=1395#comment-91</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://smartspin.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sharmin&lt;/a&gt; - You&#039;re right, there&#039;s a fine line between explaining and doing. As professionals we should ideally be expected to offer expertise that enables us to &#039;do&#039;. Some people require more explanation than others which is to be expected, but if all we&#039;re being asked to do is &#039;explain&#039; again and again, the commercial balance shifts to pure consultation which the client doesn&#039;t always want to pay for. That being the case, they should go to a library to ask their questions and when they don&#039;t like what they find, they should discuss it with the book cover. I, for one, would be a lot happier with that outcome. :-) S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://smartspin.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">Sharmin</a> &#8211; You&#8217;re right, there&#8217;s a fine line between explaining and doing. As professionals we should ideally be expected to offer expertise that enables us to &#8216;do&#8217;. Some people require more explanation than others which is to be expected, but if all we&#8217;re being asked to do is &#8216;explain&#8217; again and again, the commercial balance shifts to pure consultation which the client doesn&#8217;t always want to pay for. That being the case, they should go to a library to ask their questions and when they don&#8217;t like what they find, they should discuss it with the book cover. I, for one, would be a lot happier with that outcome. <img src='http://www.birddog.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharmin</title>
		<link>http://www.birddog.co.uk/2009/01/b2b-blogging-direct-or-indirect-marketing/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birddog.co.uk/?p=1395#comment-90</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a blessing you didn&#039;t win the account. Just think: you&#039;d have to spend half the budget explaining and justifying your strategy. Not worth it. Like most marketing &quot;managers&quot;, this one sounds like a marketing co-ordinator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a blessing you didn&#8217;t win the account. Just think: you&#8217;d have to spend half the budget explaining and justifying your strategy. Not worth it. Like most marketing &#8220;managers&#8221;, this one sounds like a marketing co-ordinator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

